Previous Entry | Next Entry

An Update: Public Style

  • Oct. 18th, 2007 at 8:54 AM
theemdash: (SG-1 Crack)
Stuff That's Not Ranting But Still About Grammar
I need questions for [livejournal.com profile] fandom_grammar. Since we don't have any yet, I'm thinking about just collecting up a few common questions so that we can get started. So, can anyone think of a few common grammar/language questions to start us off? (If it's a genuine question you want to ask, leave it at the comm, please. Thanks.)

Stuff On My Head
[livejournal.com profile] katilara posted another Brotherhood 2.0 video blog last night and in it Hank discussed keeping life silly by putting stuff on your head. Last night I wore Neville bunny on my head until I went to sleep. Today, um, well, I'm not really going to wear stuff on my head at work, but maybe I'll use pencils to hold up my hair later which will be kind of like stuff in my head and will still be silly.

ANYWAY.

I encourage you all to put stuff on your head. Or put stuff on your cat, if you're inclined, but the general theme is stuff on living beings. I think putting a shoe on a bug even counts.

I hope you all will keep me informed of what stuff you put on living beings.

Though you may consider putting stuff only on you or your pets without permission. Like, I don't think my boss would appreciate me suddenly putting a bag on her head unless I asked first*.
*I do not advocate asking your boss if you can put a bag on his or her head . . . unless you are looking for a way to be fired, which, if you are, more stuff on your boss's head to you.

Comments

[identity profile] wiccanslyr.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 01:05 pm (UTC)
Hey, been really busy with the new jorb but, wasn't there something that you posted that you wanted me to read? I think it was about the grammar thingy.
theemdash: (Daniel Home)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 01:07 pm (UTC)
Basically it's an "Are you in or are you out?" thing. The full explanation is here and I answered some questions people had here.
[identity profile] wiccanslyr.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 01:10 pm (UTC)
Cool. I'll try to read over that at lunch today.
[identity profile] katilara.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 01:15 pm (UTC)
I wonder what I could finnagle onto Her Highness' head. The answer of course, being nothing, but I can dream. :p

I should see if people will take pictures of things on their heads. I'll try and re-create the Good Omens/disappointed moose combo this evening. Hmm...
[identity profile] meridianrising.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 01:45 pm (UTC)
I was at Borders by myself once and came across that book "Stuff on my cat", and OMG, I must have looked like a crazy person by how much I was laughing. It was so stupid, but yet, so funny.
theemdash: (Doctor Who Tongue)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 02:03 pm (UTC)
I'm going for Stuff On My Flist here. Contribute! *giggles*
[identity profile] meridianrising.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 02:55 pm (UTC)
Oooh, okay, I have one. I had this kinda semi-big patch once for a band (My Chemcial Romance, if you were curious). Well, super smart that I am, I thought it was a bandana, so, I wore it on my head! ROFL ...Sad part, it fit!
ext_1548: Reid playing cards (Doctor Who_ sound of the drums)
[identity profile] scifigirl.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 06:40 pm (UTC)
I found that video a few days ago because Hank was all woo! The Office, I too am on team Pam, and I haven't really gotten to know Karen.

George likes to sit on my head. I love putting stuff on my head. *g*
[identity profile] fluffymaru.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 07:40 pm (UTC)

You guys should start out with, "It's 'canon', not 'cannon', dammit!"
theemdash: (Editing)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Oct. 18th, 2007 08:08 pm (UTC)
LOL. I don't think that will take much time. Though I am tempted to write:

Canon the thing that means an event happened.

Cannon the thing I will use to shoot you across the world when you confuse "cannon" and "canon."
[identity profile] ewanspotter.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 19th, 2007 06:19 pm (UTC)
Does putting stuff on me count?
theemdash: (Daniel Humor)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 10:48 am (UTC)
Are you asking if you're the boss of me or if people should put stuff on you or if you should put stuff on you? The answers are no and yes, depending on the question. ;)
[identity profile] mirankos.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 02:33 am (UTC)
I had a genuine question, so I posted it at the comm.

I also would like to see commas addressed. I'm newly hearing terms such as oxford comma. That's using a comma before the second to last thing in a list?

I perused a couple of the grammar rant type comms to see what issues they have that I agree with to suggest. There are the common too/to/two, there/their/they're type grumbles, but one thing that I didn't understand was "the use of between".

The example was "keep this between the three of us". I can't for the life of me think what should be used instead of between. I know it's a matter of two and more-than-two. Maybe you can tell m....oh! It just clicked. "Among", yes? Okay, never mind. *blush*


We'll pretend I only said commas.
[identity profile] mirankos.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 02:38 am (UTC)
Of course I meant comma *after* the next to last thing and therefore *before* the "and" in a list of three or more things . . . .
theemdash: (Firefly Dork)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 10:51 am (UTC)
Yep, "among." And it's difficult for me to get math people to understand that just because people say "between the three," it's not right.

I figured those are the common ones, too/to/two and there/their/they're. But I like the idea of the use of between, too.
[identity profile] mirankos.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 07:57 pm (UTC)
I've always
[identity profile] mirankos.livejournal.com wrote:
Oct. 22nd, 2007 08:08 pm (UTC)
*mutters mean things under breath*
I hit the tab button and managed to accidentally post my comment way too early. :P

Anyway, as I was trying to say . . . . .

I've always found the "number of people involved" usage determination interesting. We learned that really early on, maybe in 5th grade or middle school? I know to use -er with two and -est with more than two.

My dad had never heard that rule before, so he learned something too when I came home telling him about what we learned. I am the younger of two children, of two girls. He had always said "youngest daughter" or "oldest daughter", but made certain to be correct from the time I told him that rule. Younger or older daughter. :)

It's the one rule I've always had a slight smug feeling about knowing. It sometimes seems as if it's nearly a secret and only a privileged group is told the real rule. When I hear others say -est instead of -er and I know it's not correct, I don't correct them, but I do feel smart.

Profile

theemdash: (Default)
[personal profile] theemdash
theemdash

Latest Month

December 2024
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars