Previous Entry | Next Entry

New Stargate

  • Jul. 20th, 2017 at 10:19 PM
theemdash: (M Squee)
I'm not sure that I really have the words for this.

There's going to be more Stargate. A 10-episode digital series. That's exciting news enough, but...

It's going to be about Catherine Langford's early years.

It's going to be FEMALE-LEAD STARGATE.

Look at that beautiful thumbnail of A WOMAN in front of the Stargate:


FEMALE-LEAD. STARGATE. CATHERINE. LANGFORD.

AND THAT MEANS IT WILL ALSO BE A PERIOD PIECE.

I AM LIVING!!!

ETA: Continuing to add icing to this delicious cake: the director is a woman.

Comments

sopdetly: (Default)
[personal profile] sopdetly wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 02:30 am (UTC)
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
theemdash: (SG-1 Vala)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 02:34 am (UTC)
:D :D :D :D :D
kay_brooke: Stick drawing of a linked adenine and thymine molecule with text "DNA: my OTP" (Default)
[personal profile] kay_brooke wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 03:06 am (UTC)
Yay!
theemdash: (SG-1 Jonas)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 12:17 pm (UTC)
Like, I'd be happy enough with just new Stargate, but a story about Catherine? SIGN. ME. UP.
green_grrl: (SGA_asskicking)
[personal profile] green_grrl wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 04:23 am (UTC)
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!

At first I was, like, what? The Stargate didn't open until Ernest disappeared. But this is movie 'verse, not tv 'verse, right? So a totally different imagining of how it all works. But why did Catherine go get Daniel after the lecture to work for the USAF if she has already been through? So many questions! But female lead, female director, period piece—I am psyched! I've always loved that historical part of the movie.

ETA: Nope it's the tv 'verse. Even more questions, then! I just read the Vox article, which is really good. I totally agree with all of this:

Langford has long been a fan-favorite character, both because of her importance to the events of the overall Stargate franchise and because she serves as a crucial intermediary between geeky, intellectually curious civilians like us, the viewers, and the alien worlds of the Stargate. Additionally, she was the rare model of a competent older woman who was defined mainly by her achievements as a scientist and a military adviser.

“The only reason [the plot of Stargate] happened,” wrote culture writer Gavia Baker-Whitelaw in a 2013 blog post, “is because the 80-year-old daughter of a 1920s Egyptologist became so obsessed with an old Egyptian artefact that she spent her whole life researching it until people finally got to travel to other planets. Which to me is a far more compelling origin story than any amount of daddy issues, dead wives, or misunderstood loner antiheroes.”

“I just want a whole movie about Catherine Langford,” one Stargate fan opined on Tumblr. “Like, the whole thing is just about her working on the Stargate, fighting to get the program started, dealing with sexist asshats in the military and academic communities. ... And just generally being a badass.”

Edited 2017-07-21 04:35 am (UTC)
theemdash: (SG-1 Daniel/Sam)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 12:14 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I'm hoping the image above is just you know EXCITEMENT! but not the actual plot. I want something that's about her researching and arguing in favor of 'gate exploration (even when they weren't sure what that meant). If they want to include Ernest, too??? OKAY BY ME! :D :D :D

(Also if we get to see her eventually seeking out the work of Daniel Jackson? I would also be happy about that. HEE.)
laetificat: (Default)
[personal profile] laetificat wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 04:59 am (UTC)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
theemdash: (M YAY)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 12:14 pm (UTC)
WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE!
antares_dw: (Default)
[personal profile] antares_dw wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 06:47 am (UTC)
I only hope they don't have Malozzi on the writer team ....

I like the idea to explore the early years very much!
theemdash: (Daniel Home)
[personal profile] theemdash wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2017 12:16 pm (UTC)
HE IS NOT!

I'm not familiar with either of the writers attached and that makes me a liiiiiittle nervous because their IMDB pages don't list a lot of writing credits. BUT everything I keep reading about this is making me happy, so I'm willing to without doubt until I see it.

They're 10-minute episodes, so what we get will ultimately be short and sweet.
paragraphs: Come Travel with Me (Default)
[personal profile] paragraphs wrote:
Jul. 23rd, 2017 07:35 pm (UTC)
I am glad you are happy! I saw that and wondered "what will Em say?"

amedia: Alan Cumming grinning happily with a rainbow design behind him and the caption "SQUEE!" in playful letters (Tin Man - Squee!)
[personal profile] amedia wrote:
Jul. 27th, 2017 03:17 am (UTC)
Squee for the female lead/director! Squee for period piece!!!

I've only watched SG-1 casually--though I've watched a heckuva lot of songvids--but I shared the news with TODS, a much more regular watcher, and he was very pleased, especially about the focus. So, additional vicarious squee!!!!

Profile

theemdash: (Default)
[personal profile] theemdash
theemdash

Latest Month

December 2024
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars